Interview
by Carol
Cooper for Village Voice On-Line
CC:
As a solo artist you have worked with horn sections and now with
string sections to color and embellish your songs. Aside from a
more cerebral and cinematic atmosphere, what narrative abilities
does a string section give your compositions that a horn section
does not?
DB: Strings have an unfortunate reputation. They're
seen as the last refuge for a pop star who craves respect and to
be finally taken seriously. They also signify upwelling of passion,
sentimentality and romantic emotion- these I may be occasionally
guilty of, in measured doses...but if anything I've been taken too
seriously for years, so hardly need more of that. Horns traditionally
are more in your face, muscular, macho and, well, louder. All of
the above are of course clichés, but ones we sort of have
to acknowledge...and there is always some truth to clichés.
When enter strings playing the right counter melody or harmony to
a vocal I get all choked up inside- even on my own songs. But that's
not all they do.
CC: What motivated your inclusion of two opera
pieces on the current album? Is it their anachronistic purity that
attracts you? Or some deeper quality?
DB: I suppose they are, in a way, the key to much
of the rest of the record, for better or worse. The Verdi one was
recorded before many of the other songs were written, and I suspect
I used it as a tool, as an emotional and vocal lever, to allow the
other ones to come into existence. I see them as pop songs, OK,
pop songs that have a context- but if anything I see myself as involved
in the work of rescuing these marvelous songs from the over stylized
and rarified context they've been put in. They've been held prisoner
and they deserve to be given a little more freedom. But mainly it's
personal- not knowing if I myself could write something appropriately
emotional for the ending of Dirty Pretty Things, I felt
the Verdi piece did the job way better than I ever could. The film
people didn't agree, but trying it gave me the excuse to dip my
toe in the waters. All arias seem intrinsically fragile to me because
the melody so completely relies upon the ephemeral strength of a
human voice to deliver it. For that reason, every opera becomes
a sort of elegy to the tragic brevity of mortal existence. Well,
okay, most of them end in a death- and maybe romance, which most
of them also feature, is also a kind of death... But it never occurred
to me that the human voice carrying the tune implied the fragility
of life. Hey, speaking of "fragile" voices, have you heard
the operatic version of Ramstein lyrics? Yes, it exists. I think
Malcolm McLaren exploited that aspect of opera in Fans,
as did Janet Jackson with Kathleen Battle on Janet. On
Grown Backwards the presence of somewhat straightforward
classical pieces by Verdi and Bizet changes the relationship of
the listener to strings and vocals throughout the entire CD. Is
that intentional?
CC: In the 70's, disco used strings, and salsa
used horns to give emotional emphasis and nuance to the libidinal
drive of the rhythm section. (The most self-conscious apotheosis
of which would have been Chic's white violins.) What I notice on
Grown Backwards is a more egalitarian (if not more complex)
deployment of instrumentation than that. While rhythms are certainly
central to most of the material here, you often have percussion
instruments carrying melody, and strings provoking shifts in tempo
or anchoring beats during odd transitions between Celtic, Gypsy,
Hawaiian or country riffs. Do you break the more common musical
habits just to extend your own compositional versatility, or to
broaden the aural conditioning of your audience, or both?
DB: Whew. Well, I did work with Thom Bell on my
last record, but I think I maybe have been inspired this time by
Caetano's Livro CD, Cirano, by Piccolo Orchestra Avion Travel and
a few others. But yes, I wanted to consciously avoid the strings
as sweetener approach which we are all too familiar with. I realized
that they could be part of the band, given enough sonic space and
the right arrangements. And it works! All this can devolve into
so much musing if it goes too far- the unanswered question is why?
If I'm not hankering for respect that why do this?
CC: These days songs don't get too much more overtly
political than "Empire". Beyond preaching to the converted,
who would be your ideal audience for this song?
DB: You know, that song's been around for a while-
but now seems like a time when the American Empire as an idea has
gained currency. What I find frightening about it, the song, is
that despite being hugely ironic, it has the power of a stirring
melody- melodically it touches, possibly even inspires, the very
emotions and feelings it is criticizing. To me it's about the conflicts
inherent in music. Born In The USA was a patriotic anthem
despite all intentions to the contrary.
CC: "She Only Sleeps" and "Civilization"
are both delightfully intimate glimpses into the state of modern
romance, where the female is given all the power and agency in the
relationship. This somewhat pagan, tantric attitude can be traced
in your work at least as far back as "The Great Curve".
Is the bemused, ego-demon beset male protagonist in your songs always
waiting for some feminine power or initiative to save him from himself?
DB: Jeez, just when I thought these songs from
the feminine side were simply a side effect of my age, you point
out that, yes, I've been doing it all my life. Yes, techno-paganism
is the future. I don't know if that's a pseudo McLuhanism but I
have sensed for some time that the information age is female and
the enlightenment, with modernism as it's dead end, is male. Woops,
sounds like another McLuhanist sound bite. Even rock and roll, of
course is pagan...and possibly despite all the pelvic thrusting
it was an aspect the big mama coming back to roost. I do think our
official culture is way too rational and logical – it's a
religion that is in desperate need of a counter measure, and that's
not to say chaos and irrationality, but maybe some more empathy
and soul.
CC: Much of the wry humor on Grown Backwards
comes from melodic quotes seemingly out of vintage vaudeville or
British music hall sources. Has scoring for film and theater pieces
given you a taste for the satiric potential in musical comedy? Is
there a Dennis Potter musical in you screaming to get out?
DB: Those kinds of melodies were, except for a
few acts, pretty universally un-PC in the rock and R&B worlds,
but occasionally if one comes to visit I don't kick it out. They
have to be handled with care though- "Glad" could easily
have turned into the Teddy Bears Picnic. I don’t think I would
ever do a musical - musical, but a longer single themed project
has been on my mind.
CC: "Dialog Box" sounds like something
August Darnell would have written around the time of "Wise
Guys". Its zoot suit cynicism and gangsterish charm is a tiny
tugboat of funk amidst little islands of Las Vegas-inflected tangos,
violin concerti, and Bossa Nova. Multiculturalism seen as a sonic
theme park. The collision between a wash of Gamelan percussion and
Sgt. Pepperish production number inside "The Other Side of
This Life" is wonderfully bizarre...it is as if you created
a tone parallel for 21st Century "globalization" politics.
Do you mean for these songs to function as autocritiques or just
as closely observed slices of life?
DB: Dialog Box started as another little ballad,
like some of the others, but as an experiment I tried a bigger beat
and there was no going back. I was actually listening to Missy Elliot's
last few records when I was writing that one- no musical effect,
but for instance, this verse "Gonna test ya - With a
gesture - Do I feel ya? - Are ya scared?" Probably
came from "Work It". Am I in trouble now?, I don't think
so. "The Other Side Of This Life", yes, sometimes I tell
audiences it's from an upcoming musical about an Indonesian man
who, with some corporate support, realizes his dream of becoming
a Vegas lounge singer- an institution that barely exists anymore.
But that's just a stage story. One night I said it was a musical
about a brain damaged man who finds that by singing he can "sing" his way through getting dressed, getting to work, etc.- probably
something I read in an Oliver Sacks book. I noticed a woman behind
a man in wheelchair off to the side, waving frantically. Later I
met them and was told the man in the wheelchair has exactly that
neurological quirk. He typed out a message on a little teletype
machine he had. I realize the song also my goofy take on loving
and accepting Globalization and life as the dark shadow of show
business. (I like this last bit, that we all live in the penumbra
of show business) The world throws all this disparate stuff together,
so maybe I'm merely reflecting some of it. Sometimes a mere description
serves as a comment.
CC: Through the years I've noticed that music critics
go out of their way to avoid discussing the spiritual aspects of
your work. Despite song and album titles like "Remain in Light",
"Speaking in Tongues," "Tiny Apocalypse", "Walk
on Water," "Angels," "Lily of the Valley",
etc: they always go out of their way to ignore the shaman in you,
the desert prophet in you. (Not even the speculative truisms of
"In the Future" convinced them.) As far as Jon Pareles,
Lester Bangs, John Rockwell, Robert Palmer, Ira Mayer, Barbara Graustark
and the rest of the usual subjects, all religious allusions you
make are mere poetry...mere allegory for some sort of pomo-perennial
existential nervous breakdown. I hate this kind of elitist elision.
It pretends to some sort of Freudian rationalism, but in reality
it just rejects out of hand the existence of anything left un-demystified
by Western science. So just what is your position on the
esoteric underpinnings of gospel? Of New Orleans funeral music?
Of all Afro-Latin and African percussion, and most folk music from
around the world?
DB: See McLuhanisms above. In a way I'm sort of
relieved that that part of my work gets ignored- setting oneself
up as a religious prophet has dire career (and personal) consequences.
Back to paganism. I have a long-term fascination and love of the
various Afro-Atlantic religions- Voudoun, Candomblé, Santeria
and the Gospel Church. The latter doesn’t have the panoply
of Gods and Goddesses, but the celebration is somewhat similar.
Well, all of the above and pop music, especially pop music with
roots in Black culture, draw from the same well. That became obvious
pretty quickly. It's a powerful combination- no wonder it's "conquered" the world- it's not just the power of the multinationals that makes
Malaysians and Brazilians groove to mainly American pop- it has
synthesized the cultures in much the same way that these religions
have syncretized African with European religions. I could go on
and on- when you worship at the altar of the groove, of pop music,
you are also leaving European and Middle Eastern religion behind.
You are not longer one of the people of the book, so to speak. The
sub atomic rhythms have become internalized in the body and some
kind of techno pagan trance thing is being born.
CC: Even though on "Why" you claim to
have no overt philosophy, would you say that humanity today is suffering
from too much spirituality or too much atheism?
DB: Yes, both. Well put. Though I would qualify
the spirituality as religion- which is always fixed, dogmatic, whereas
spirituality is floating, unmoored, uncertain. The atheism, likewise,
is equally dogmatic. In here I include the whole enlightenment and
modernist faith in science, human knowledge and reason- all of which
have proved no more able to bring about human happiness than the
religions it supplanted. Two competing dogmas. Both equally stubborn
and intransigent.
CC: When you selected "Cálice" sung by Chico Buarque and Milton Nascimento to be the bonus cassette
track on your first Brazilian music composition, were you not
astonished and profoundly moved by its utterly appropriate and revelatory
fusion of Catholic and political symbolism? When researching Brazilian
pop did you not notice how its impact is always heightened
by deeply ingrained metaphysical subtexts?
DB: From a distance it appears a pop utopia- a
place where all sorts of music, ideas and approaches can be encompassed – but I suspect that's a bit of a Myth. But as Caetano points
out, myths have their uses- the Brazilian myth of no racism doesn't
exist, far from it- but the existence of the myth establishes a
popular ideal, a goal. It places a concept within one’s living
vocabulary, to borrow from Wittgenstein- by allowing us to imagine
it, it comes that much closer to allowing it to exist.
CC: You played the Apollo Theater shortly after
9/11. What thoughts and emotions did that happenstance provoke in
you? Bringing your quintessentially "downtown" audience
uptown to the comparative haven of Harlem for that show suddenly
became symbolic on levels that could never have entered the public's
mind had the World Trade Center still been intact. This was clearly
a rare opportunity for an artist whose work has always leaned towards
the prophetic, broadly transformative and cataclysmic. Suddenly
all your prior lyrical hints and warnings became more than arty,
science-fictional speculation. Did you then feel your role as artist
more keenly? Did you feel more motivated to comfort them in their
newly awakened distress, or to subtly infer "I told you so?"
DB: Oh my God. Doing "Life During Wartime", which
we'd recently added to the set, with strings, a couple of weeks
after 9/11 was unnerving. Thank goodness I didn't have "Listening
Wind" in the set- the TH song from a bomb planters POV!! Everything,
every song, took on a new meaning, added weight. Sometimes inappropriately,
some songs, some work, doesn't deserve or support the weight, but
some others can. Even a song about a relationship can seem more
touching, dealing with that it is to be alive. Some of that weight
floats off, fades and it's just a song again- but tonight I perform
in Madrid, need I say more? Watching the audience bopping to "Life
During Wartime" was sort of disconcerting- once again, as with
"Empire", a reminder that music has this innate power
that is often at total odds with the lyrics. Sometimes, as in these
songs, that disjunction is intentional, but it's still weird to
experience it.
CC: Prince spent most of the 90's cremating his
American rock star profile and essentially reincarnating himself
as an obscure underground jazz-fusion artist. Similarly, you set
aside the crown of art-rock royalty thrust upon you during your
leadership of Talking Heads to become something...else. Despite
the rock elements in much of your solo work, you have essentially
spent the last ten years reinventing yourself as a third world pop
musician. What are the advantages and disadvantages from your point
of view in rejecting the obvious perks of the stylistic, cultural
and commercial category of "Anglo/American rock star"?
DB: Whoa, OK, I did find the prospect of becoming
an arena act disheartening and alienating. But I'd already made
records like Bush Of Ghosts, Catherine Wheel and
The Knee Plays in the 80's that said I was already trying
to straddle two puddles, or two canoes, or something. So it wasn't
like I suddenly branched out all of a sudden. Like some other artists,
upon parting with Talking Heads, my bread and butter, I also perversely
set out to sabotage my own career, releasing first a Latin record
and then an orchestral score immediately, one right after the other,
but then after a while I managed to reintegrate a lot of more pop
song material and attitude, at least to some extent. But those other
things became integrated into the pop songs too. I do miss having
more available funds and creative platforms- MTV used to air Talking
Heads (and others) videos almost the week they came off the editing
machine. That doesn’t happen to anyone I know now, and that's
not a result of my screwy career decisions. I didn't realize I'd
become a 3rd world pop musician, I thought I was a little more global
than that- my recording budgets are pretty decent too. But OK, I
get your point. The disadvantages of said career move was initially
less press outlets, more limited radio play, etc...but only for
a while. I think (I always think this) that the tide is turning.
The record business is in trouble, (snore), but there's some great
new music out there.
CC: Peter Gabriel has used the WOMAD global festival
series and you have used the Luaka Bop label in part to offer a
certain commercial parity for non-white and/or "non-western" pop acts, and increased mainstream exposure for interesting performers
who may or may not sing in English, or have easy, natural access
to the hit-making machinery of the so-called developed world. How
do you judge the success of that effort?
DB: Musical and cultural success...dismal financial
failure. I never liked the idea, which was sometimes thrust upon
me as a result of all this world music stuff, that I'm a do-gooder
out to bring nice music to the head banging masses brainwashed by
the multinationals. Being a do-gooder sits about as easy with me
as the shaman prophet role. Imagine the stage costume! Neither seems
very sexy or much like fun. And that is what I think a lot of the
Luaka music is and was- sexy and fun. It is hugely deep, it swings
and it often has political and cultural import- but first things
first.
CC: As a result of promoting a multicultural artist
roster like Luaka Bop's have you simultaneously codified a broader
context for your own musical experiments?
DB: Well, I do wonder as much how a record or tour
is going to be received in Latin America as much as in Chicago. "Lazy", the X-Press 2 version, was a huge club hit around
the world- except for guess where. So I do know there is a world
out there. Duh. Did I miss something? Is that what you were asking?
CC: And do you think Luaka Bop's exposure of key
source material from countries like Brazil, Cabo Verde, Peru and
other outposts of the African Diaspora helped curb the practice
of calling "world beat" any American or European studio
project which derives its "crossover" hooks from sampling
an ethnographic recording wherein ethnic singers and musicians are
playing anonymously for free and thereby get no writing credits
or royalties?
DB: Hmmm. I do think things have changed a lot.
Sometimes it came from unexpected places. Sometimes it was the dance
music community that introduced Brazilian or Latin grooves to the
Anglo dance floor, and thereby made those grooves fun, cool and
palatable. At Luaka we tried to emphasize the artist as relevant
contemporary music, from wherever. We tried to reduce the perception
of the exotic, but its a long hard slog. Now, with the governments
new policies, getting these artists in to record, mix, promote and
tour is becoming close to impossible. The US has closed its cultural
gates and thereby written it's own cultural death sentence. Nothing
comes from nothing, and the US has an incredible wealth of talent,
but throughout history it was always the nations that were the most
open that came up with the incredible business deals and the latest
directions and inspirations.
|